FANDOM


Global warming and climate change can both refer to the observed century-scale rise in the average temperature of the Earth's climate system and its related effects, although climate change can also refer to any historic change in climate. Multiple lines of scientific evidence show that the climate system is warming.[1][2] More than 90% of the additional energy stored in the climate system since 1970 has gone into ocean warming; the remainder has melted ice, and warmed the continents and atmosphere.[3][lower-alpha 1] Many of the observed changes since the 1950s are unprecedented over decades to millennia.[4]

Since the 1980s global warming has become more acute and noticeable; February 1985 was the most recent month that was colder than the 20th century mean. [5]

Scientific understanding of global warming has been increasing. In its fifth assessment (AR5) in 2014 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that scientists were more than 95% certain that most of global warming is caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases and other human (anthropogenic) activities.[6][7][8] Climate model projections summarized in AR5 indicated that during the 21st century the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 0.3 to 1.7 °C (0.5 to 3.1 °F) for their lowest emissions scenario using stringent mitigation and 2.6 to 4.8 °C (4.7 to 8.6 °F) for their highest.[9] These findings have been recognized by the national science academies of the major industrialized nations.[10][lower-alpha 2]

Future climate change and associated impacts will be different from region to region around the globe.[12][13] The effects of an increase in global temperature include a rise in sea levels and a change in the amount and pattern of precipitation, as well as a probable expansion of subtropical deserts.[14] Warming is expected to be strongest in the Arctic, with the continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects of the warming include more frequent extreme weather events including heat waves, droughts, heavy rainfall, and heavy snowfall;[15] ocean acidification; and species extinctions due to shifting temperature regimes. Effects significant to humans include the threat to food security from decreasing crop yields and the loss of habitat from inundation.[16][17]

Possible responses to global warming include mitigation by emissions reduction, adaptation to its effects, building systems resilient to its effects, and possible future climate engineering. Most countries are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC),[18] whose ultimate objective is to prevent dangerous anthropogenic climate change.[19] The UNFCCC have adopted a range of policies designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions[20][21][22][23] and to assist in adaptation to global warming.[20][23][24][25] Parties to the UNFCCC have agreed that deep cuts in emissions are required,[26] and that future global warming should be limited to below 2.0 °C (3.6 °F) relative to the pre-industrial level.[26][lower-alpha 3]

Observed temperature changes Edit

Main article: Instrumental temperature record
File:2000 Year Temperature Comparison.png
File:Enso-global-temp-anomalies.png
File:Energy change inventory, 1971-2010.svg

The Earth's average surface temperature rose by 0.74±0.18 °C over the period 1906–2005. The rate of warming over the last half of that period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13±0.03 °C per decade, versus 0.07±0.02 °C per decade). The urban heat island effect is very small, estimated to account for less than 0.002 °C of warming per decade since 1900.[30] Temperatures in the lower troposphere have increased between 0.13 and 0.22 °C (0.22 and 0.4 °F) per decade since 1979, according to satellite temperature measurements. Climate proxies show the temperature to have been relatively stable over the one or two thousand years before 1850, with regionally varying fluctuations such as the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age.[31]

The warming that is evident in the instrumental temperature record is consistent with a wide range of observations, as documented by many independent scientific groups.[32] Examples include sea level rise (due to melting of snow and ice and because water above 3.98 °C expands as it warms),[33] widespread melting of snow and ice,[34] increased heat content of the oceans,[32] increased humidity,[32] and the earlier timing of spring events,[35] e.g., the flowering of plants.[36] The probability that these changes could have occurred by chance is virtually zero.[32]

Recent estimates by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) and the National Climatic Data Center show that 2005 and 2010 tied for the planet's warmest year since reliable, widespread instrumental measurements became available in the late 19th century, exceeding 1998 by a few hundredths of a degree.[37][38][39] Estimates by the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) show 2005 as the second warmest year, behind 1998 with 2003 and 2010 tied for third warmest year, however, "the error estimate for individual years ... is at least ten times larger than the differences between these three years."[40] The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) WMO statement on the status of the global climate in 2010 explains that, "The 2010 nominal value of +0.53 °C ranks just ahead of those of 2005 (+0.52 °C) and 1998 (+0.51 °C), although the differences between the three years are not statistically significant..."[41] Every year from 1986 to 2013 has seen annual average global land and ocean surface temperatures above the 1961–1990 average.[42][43]

Surface temperatures in 1998 were unusually warm because global temperatures are affected by the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and the strongest El Niño in the past century occurred during that year.[44] Global temperature is subject to short-term fluctuations that overlay long-term trends and can temporarily mask them. The relative stability in surface temperature from 2002 to 2009—which has been dubbed the global warming hiatus by the media and some scientists—[45] is consistent with such an episode.[46][47] 2010 was also an El Niño year. On the low swing of the oscillation, 2011 as a La Niña year was cooler but it was still the 11th warmest year since records began in 1880. Of the 13 warmest years since 1880, 11 were the years from 2001 to 2011. Over the more recent record, 2011 was the warmest La Niña year in the period from 1950 to 2011, and was close to 1997, which was not at the lowest point of the cycle.[48]

Temperature changes vary over the globe. Since 1979, land temperatures have increased about twice as fast as ocean temperatures (0.25 °C per decade against 0.13 °C per decade).[49] Ocean temperatures increase more slowly than land temperatures because of the larger effective heat capacity of the oceans and because the ocean loses more heat by evaporation.[50] The northern hemisphere is also naturally warmer than the southern hemisphere mainly because of meridional heat transport in the oceans, which has a differential of about 0.9 petawatts northwards,[51] with an additional contribution from the albedo differences between the polar regions. Since the beginning of industrialisation the temperature difference between the hemispheres has increased due to melting of sea ice and snow in the North.[52] Average arctic temperatures have been increasing at almost twice the rate of the rest of the world in the past 100 years; however arctic temperatures are also highly variable.[53] Although more greenhouse gases are emitted in the Northern than Southern Hemisphere this does not contribute to the difference in warming because the major greenhouse gases persist long enough to mix between hemispheres.[54]

The thermal inertia of the oceans and slow responses of other indirect effects mean that climate can take centuries or longer to adjust to changes in forcing. Climate commitment studies indicate that even if greenhouse gases were stabilized at year 2000 levels, a further warming of about 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) would still occur.[55]

Initial causes of temperature changes (external forcings) Edit

Main article: Attribution of recent climate change
Greenhouse effect schematic showing energy flows between space, the atmosphere, and Earth's surface. Energy exchanges are expressed in watts per square meter (W/m2).
This graph, known as the Keeling Curve, shows the increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations from 1958–2013. Monthly CO2 measurements display seasonal oscillations in an upward trend; each year's maximum occurs during the Northern Hemisphere's late spring, and declines during its growing season as plants remove some atmospheric CO2.

The climate system can respond to changes in external forcings.[56][57] External forcings can "push" the climate in the direction of warming or cooling.[58] Examples of external forcings include changes in atmospheric composition (e.g., increased concentrations of greenhouse gases), solar luminosity, volcanic eruptions, and variations in Earth's orbit around the Sun.[59] Orbital cycles vary slowly over tens of thousands of years, and at present are in an overall cooling trend—which would be expected to lead towards a glacial period within the current ice age, but the 20th century instrumental temperature record shows a sudden rise in global temperatures.[60]

Greenhouse gases Edit

Main article: Greenhouse gas

The greenhouse effect is the process by which absorption and emission of infrared radiation by gases in a planet's atmosphere warm its lower atmosphere and surface. It was proposed by Joseph Fourier in 1824, discovered in 1860 by John Tyndall,[61] was first investigated quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896,[62] and was developed in the 1930s through 1960s by Guy Stewart Callendar.[63]

Annual world greenhouse gas emissions, in 2010, by sector.
Percentage share of global cumulative energy-related CO2 emissions between 1751 and 2012 across different regions.

On Earth, naturally occurring amounts of greenhouse gases have a mean warming effect of about 33 °C (59 °F).[64][lower-alpha 4] Without the Earth's atmosphere, the Earth's average temperature would be well below the freezing temperature of water.[65] The major greenhouse gases are water vapor, which causes about 36–70% of the greenhouse effect; carbon dioxide (CO2), which causes 9–26%; methane (CH4), which causes 4–9%; and ozone (O3), which causes 3–7%.[66][67][68] Clouds also affect the radiation balance through cloud forcings similar to greenhouse gases.

Human activity since the Industrial Revolution has increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, leading to increased radiative forcing from CO2, methane, tropospheric ozone, CFCs and nitrous oxide. According to work published in 2007, the concentrations of CO2 and methane have increased by 36% and 148% respectively since 1750.[69] These levels are much higher than at any time during the last 800,000 years, the period for which reliable data has been extracted from ice cores.[70][71][72][73] Less direct geological evidence indicates that CO2 values higher than this were last seen about 20 million years ago.[74] Fossil fuel burning has produced about three-quarters of the increase in CO2 from human activity over the past 20 years. The rest of this increase is caused mostly by changes in land-use, particularly deforestation.[75] Estimates of global CO2 emissions in 2011 from fossil fuel combustion, including cement production and gas flaring, was 34.8 billion tonnes (9.5 ± 0.5 PgC), an increase of 54% above emissions in 1990. Coal burning was responsible for 43% of the total emissions, oil 34%, gas 18%, cement 4.9% and gas flaring 0.7%[76] In May 2013, it was reported that readings for CO2 taken at the world's primary benchmark site in Mauna Loa surpassed 400 ppm. According to professor Brian Hoskins, this is likely the first time CO2 levels have been this high for about 4.5 million years.[77][78]

Over the last three decades of the twentieth century, gross domestic product per capita and population growth were the main drivers of increases in greenhouse gas emissions.[79] CO2 emissions are continuing to rise due to the burning of fossil fuels and land-use change.[80][81]:71 Emissions can be attributed to different regions. Attribution of emissions due to land-use change is a controversial issue.[82][83]:289

Emissions scenarios, estimates of changes in future emission levels of greenhouse gases, have been projected that depend upon uncertain economic, sociological, technological, and natural developments.[84] In most scenarios, emissions continue to rise over the century, while in a few, emissions are reduced.[85][86] Fossil fuel reserves are abundant, and will not limit carbon emissions in the 21st century.[87] Emission scenarios, combined with modelling of the carbon cycle, have been used to produce estimates of how atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases might change in the future. Using the six IPCC SRES "marker" scenarios, models suggest that by the year 2100, the atmospheric concentration of CO2 could range between 541 and 970 ppm.[88] This is 90–250% above the concentration in the year 1750.

The popular media and the public often confuse global warming with ozone depletion, i.e., the destruction of stratospheric ozone (e.g., the ozone layer) by chlorofluorocarbons.[89][90] Although there are a few areas of linkage, the relationship between the two is not strong. Reduced stratospheric ozone has had a slight cooling influence on surface temperatures, while increased tropospheric ozone has had a somewhat larger warming effect.[91]

File:Evidence CO2.jpg

Particulates and soot Edit

File:ShipTracks MODIS 2005may11.jpg

Global dimming, a gradual reduction in the amount of global direct irradiance at the Earth's surface, was observed from 1961 until at least 1990.[92] The main cause of this dimming is particulates produced by volcanoes and human made pollutants, which exerts a cooling effect by increasing the reflection of incoming sunlight. The effects of the products of fossil fuel combustion – CO2 and aerosols – have partially offset one another in recent decades, so that net warming has been due to the increase in non-CO2 greenhouse gases such as methane.[93] Radiative forcing due to particulates is temporally limited due to wet deposition, which causes them to have an atmospheric lifetime of one week. Carbon dioxide has a lifetime of a century or more, and as such, changes in particulate concentrations will only delay climate changes due to carbon dioxide.[94] Black carbon is second only to carbon dioxide for its contribution to global warming.[95]

In addition to their direct effect by scattering and absorbing solar radiation, particulates have indirect effects on the Earth's radiation budget. Sulfates act as cloud condensation nuclei and thus lead to clouds that have more and smaller cloud droplets. These clouds reflect solar radiation more efficiently than clouds with fewer and larger droplets, phenomenon known as the Twomey effect.[96] This effect also causes droplets to be of more uniform size, which reduces growth of raindrops and makes the cloud more reflective to incoming sunlight, known as the Albrecht effect.[97] Indirect effects are most noticeable in marine stratiform clouds, and have very little radiative effect on convective clouds. Indirect effects of particulates represent the largest uncertainty in radiative forcing.[98]

Soot may either cool or warm Earth's climate system, depending on whether it is airborne or deposited. Atmospheric soot directly absorbs solar radiation, which heats the atmosphere and cools the surface. In isolated areas with high soot production, such as rural India, as much as 50% of surface warming due to greenhouse gases may be masked by atmospheric brown clouds.[99] When deposited, especially on glaciers or on ice in arctic regions, the lower surface albedo can also directly heat the surface.[100] The influences of particulates, including black carbon, are most pronounced in the tropics and sub-tropics, particularly in Asia, while the effects of greenhouse gases are dominant in the extratropics and southern hemisphere.[101]

File:Changes in total solar irradiance and monthly sunspot numbers, 1975-2013.png
File:Radiative-forcings.svg

Solar activity Edit

Main article: Solar variation

Since 1978, solar irradiance has been measured by satellites.[104] These measurements indicate that the Sun's output has not increased since 1978, so the warming during the past 30 years cannot be attributed to an increase in solar energy reaching the Earth.

Climate models have been used to examine the role of the sun in recent climate change.[105] Models are unable to reproduce the rapid warming observed in recent decades when they only take into account variations in solar output and volcanic activity. Models are, however, able to simulate the observed 20th century changes in temperature when they include all of the most important external forcings, including human influences and natural forcings.

Another line of evidence against the sun having caused recent climate change comes from looking at how temperatures at different levels in the Earth's atmosphere have changed.[106] Models and observations show that greenhouse warming results in warming of the lower atmosphere (called the troposphere) but cooling of the upper atmosphere (called the stratosphere).[107][108] Depletion of the ozone layer by chemical refrigerants has also resulted in a strong cooling effect in the stratosphere. If the sun were responsible for observed warming, warming of both the troposphere and stratosphere would be expected.[109]

Feedback Edit

Main article: Climate change feedback
File:Aerial view of the edge of the ice in Nunavut 2.jpg

The climate system includes a range of feedbacks, which alter the response of the system to changes in external forcings. Positive feedbacks increase the response of the climate system to an initial forcing, while negative feedbacks reduce the response of the climate system to an initial forcing.[110]

There are a range of feedbacks in the climate system, including water vapor, changes in ice-albedo (snow and ice cover affect how much the Earth's surface absorbs or reflects incoming sunlight), clouds, and changes in the Earth's carbon cycle (e.g., the release of carbon from soil).[111] The main negative feedback is the energy the Earth's surface radiates into space as infrared radiation.[112] According to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, if the absolute temperature (as measured in kelvin) doubles,[lower-alpha 5] radiated energy increases by a factor of 16 (2 to the 4th power).[113]

Feedbacks are an important factor in determining the sensitivity of the climate system to increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Other factors being equal, a higher climate sensitivity means that more warming will occur for a given increase in greenhouse gas forcing.[114] Uncertainty over the effect of feedbacks is a major reason why different climate models project different magnitudes of warming for a given forcing scenario. More research is needed to understand the role of clouds[110] and carbon cycle feedbacks in climate projections.[115]

The IPCC projections given in the lede span the "likely" range (greater than 66% probability, based on expert judgement)[6] for the selected emissions scenarios. However, the IPCC's projections do not reflect the full range of uncertainty.[116] The lower end of the "likely" range appears to be better constrained than the upper end of the "likely" range.[116]

Climate models Edit

Main article: Global climate model
Calculations of global warming prepared in or before 2001 from a range of climate models under the SRES A2 emissions scenario, which assumes no action is taken to reduce emissions and regionally divided economic development.
Projected change in annual mean surface air temperature from the late 20th century to the middle 21st century, based on a medium emissions scenario (SRES A1B).[117] This scenario assumes that no future policies are adopted to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Image credit: NOAA GFDL.[118]

A climate model is a computerized representation of the five components of the climate system: Atmosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere, land surface, and biosphere.[119] Such models are based on scientific disciplines such as fluid dynamics, thermodynamics as well as physical processes such as radiative transfer. The models take into account various components, such as local air movement, temperature, clouds, and other atmospheric properties; ocean temperature, salt content, and circulation; ice cover on land and sea; the transfer of heat and moisture from soil and vegetation to the atmosphere; chemical and biological processes; solar variability and others.

Although researchers attempt to include as many processes as possible, simplifications of the actual climate system are inevitable because of the constraints of available computer power and limitations in knowledge of the climate system. Results from models can also vary due to different greenhouse gas inputs and the model's climate sensitivity. For example, the uncertainty in IPCC's 2007 projections is caused by (1) the use of multiple models[116] with differing sensitivity to greenhouse gas concentrations,[120] (2) the use of differing estimates of humanities' future greenhouse gas emissions,[116] (3) any additional emissions from climate feedbacks that were not included in the models IPCC used to prepare its report, i.e., greenhouse gas releases from permafrost.[121]

The models do not assume the climate will warm due to increasing levels of greenhouse gases. Instead the models predict how greenhouse gases will interact with radiative transfer and other physical processes. One of the mathematical results of these complex equations is a prediction whether warming or cooling will occur.[122]

Recent research has called special attention to the need to refine models with respect to the effect of clouds[123] and the carbon cycle.[124][125][126]

Models are also used to help investigate the causes of recent climate change by comparing the observed changes to those that the models project from various natural and human-derived causes. Although these models do not unambiguously attribute the warming that occurred from approximately 1910 to 1945 to either natural variation or human effects, they do indicate that the warming since 1970 is dominated by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.[59]

The physical realism of models is tested by examining their ability to simulate contemporary or past climates.[127] Climate models produce a good match to observations of global temperature changes over the last century, but do not simulate all aspects of climate.[128] Not all effects of global warming are accurately predicted by the climate models used by the IPCC. Observed Arctic shrinkage has been faster than that predicted.[129] Precipitation increased proportional to atmospheric humidity, and hence significantly faster than global climate models predict.[130][131] Since 1990, sea level has also risen considerably faster than models predicted it would.[132]

Observed and expected environmental effects Edit

Main article: Effects of global warming
File:Projections of global mean sea level rise by Parris et al. (2012).png

"Detection" is the process of demonstrating that climate has changed in some defined statistical sense, without providing a reason for that change. Detection does not imply attribution of the detected change to a particular cause. "Attribution" of causes of climate change is the process of establishing the most likely causes for the detected change with some defined level of confidence.[135] Detection and attribution may also be applied to observed changes in physical, ecological and social systems.[136]

Natural systems Edit

Main article: Physical impacts of climate change

Global warming has been detected in a number of natural systems. Some of these changes are described in the section on observed temperature changes, e.g., sea level rise and widespread decreases in snow and ice extent.[137] Anthropogenic forcing has likely contributed to some of the observed changes, including sea level rise, changes in climate extremes (such as the number of warm and cold days), declines in Arctic sea ice extent, glacier retreat, and greening of the Sahara.[138][139]

File:Glacier Mass Balance.png

Over the 21st century,[140] the IPCC projects that global mean sea level could rise by 0.18–0.59 m.[141] The IPCC do not provide a best estimate of global mean sea level rise, and their upper estimate of 59 cm is not an upper-bound, i.e., global mean sea level could rise by more than 59 cm by 2100.[141] The IPCC's projections are conservative, and may underestimate future sea level rise.[142] Over the 21st century, Parris and others suggest that global mean sea level could rise by 0.2 to 2.0 m (0.7–6.6 ft), relative to mean sea level in 1992.[133]

Widespread coastal flooding would be expected if several degrees of warming is sustained for millennia.[143] For example, sustained global warming of more than 2 °C (relative to pre-industrial levels) could lead to eventual sea level rise of around 1 to 4 m due to thermal expansion of sea water and the melting of glaciers and small ice caps.[143] Melting of the Greenland ice sheet could contribute an additional 4 to 7.5 m over many thousands of years.[143]

Changes in regional climate are expected to include greater warming over land, with most warming at high northern latitudes, and least warming over the Southern Ocean and parts of the North Atlantic Ocean.[144] During the 21st century, glaciers[145] and snow cover[146] are projected to continue their widespread retreat. Projections of declines in Arctic sea ice vary.[147][148] Recent projections suggest that Arctic summers could be ice-free (defined as ice extent less than 1 million square km) as early as 2025-2030.[149]

Future changes in precipitation are expected to follow existing trends, with reduced precipitation over subtropical land areas, and increased precipitation at subpolar latitudes and some equatorial regions.[150] Projections suggest a probable increase in the frequency and severity of some extreme weather events, such as heat waves.[151]

Ecological systems Edit

Main article: Climate change and ecosystems

In terrestrial ecosystems, the earlier timing of spring events, and poleward and upward shifts in plant and animal ranges, have been linked with high confidence to recent warming.[137] Future climate change is expected to particularly affect certain ecosystems, including tundra, mangroves, and coral reefs.[144] It is expected that most ecosystems will be affected by higher atmospheric CO2 levels, combined with higher global temperatures.[152] Overall, it is expected that climate change will result in the extinction of many species and reduced diversity of ecosystems.[153]

Increases in atmospheric CO2 concentrations have led to an increase in ocean acidity.[154] Dissolved CO2 increases ocean acidity, which is measured by lower pH values.[154] Between 1750 to 2000, surface-ocean pH has decreased by ≈0.1, from ≈8.2 to ≈8.1.[155] Surface-ocean pH has probably not been below ≈8.1 during the past 2 million years.[155] Projections suggest that surface-ocean pH could decrease by an additional 0.3–0.4 units by 2100.[156] Future ocean acidification could threaten coral reefs, fisheries, protected species, and other natural resources of value to society.[154][157]

Long-term effects Edit

Main article: Long-term effects of global warming

On the timescale of centuries to millennia, the magnitude of global warming will be determined primarily by anthropogenic CO2 emissions.[158] This is due to carbon dioxide's very long lifetime in the atmosphere.[158]

Stabilizing global average temperature would require reductions in anthropogenic CO2 emissions.[158] Reductions in emissions of non-CO2 anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) (e.g., methane and nitrous oxide) would also be necessary.[158][159] For CO2, anthropogenic emissions would need to be reduced by more than 80% relative to their peak level.[158] Even if this were achieved, global average temperatures would remain close to their highest level for many centuries.[158]

Large-scale and abrupt impacts Edit

Main article: Abrupt climate change

Climate change could result in global, large-scale changes in natural and social systems.[160] Two examples are ocean acidification caused by increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, and the long-term melting of ice sheets, which contributes to sea level rise.[161]

Some large-scale changes could occur abruptly, i.e., over a short time period, and might also be irreversible. An example of abrupt climate change is the rapid release of methane and carbon dioxide from permafrost, which would lead to amplified global warming.[162][163] Scientific understanding of abrupt climate change is generally poor.[164] The probability of abrupt change for some climate related feedbacks may be low.[162][165] Factors that may increase the probability of abrupt climate change include higher magnitudes of global warming, warming that occurs more rapidly, and warming that is sustained over longer time periods.[165]

Observed and expected effects on social systems Edit

The effects of climate change on human systems, mostly due to warming or shifts in precipitation patterns, or both, have been detected worldwide. Production of wheat and maize globally has been impacted by climate change. While crop production has increased in some mid-latitude regions such as the UK and Northeast China, economic losses due to extreme weather events have increased globally. There has been a shift from cold- to heat-related mortality in some regions as a result of warming. Livelihoods of indigenous peoples of the Arctic have been altered by climate change, and there is emerging evidence of climate change impacts on livelihoods of indigenous peoples in other regions. Regional impacts of climate change are now observable at more locations than before, on all continents and across ocean regions.[166]

The future social impacts of climate change will be uneven.[167] Many risks are expected to increase with higher magnitudes of global warming.[168] All regions are at risk of experiencing negative impacts.[169] Low-latitude, less developed areas face the greatest risk.[170] Examples of impacts include:

  • Food: Crop production will probably be negatively affected in low latitude countries, while effects at northern latitudes may be positive or negative.[171] Global warming of around 4.6 °C relative to pre-industrial levels could pose a large risk to global and regional food security.[172]
  • Health: Generally impacts will be more negative than positive.[173] Impacts include: the effects of extreme weather, leading to injury and loss of life;[174] and indirect effects, such as undernutrition brought on by crop failures.[175]

Habitat inundation Edit

File:Natural disasters caused by climate change.png
See also: Climate refugee

In small islands and mega deltas, inundation as a result of sea level rise is expected to threaten vital infrastructure and human settlements.[176][177] This could lead to issues of homelessness in countries with low lying areas such as Bangladesh, as well as statelessness for populations in countries such as the Maldives and Tuvalu.[178]

Possible responses to global warming Edit

Mitigation Edit

Main article: Climate change mitigation
File:Limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius - options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (PBL).png

Mitigation of climate change are actions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, or enhance the capacity of carbon sinks to absorb GHGs from the atmosphere.[180] There is a large potential for future reductions in emissions by a combination of activities, including: energy conservation and increased energy efficiency; the use of low-carbon energy technologies, such as renewable energy, nuclear energy, and carbon capture and storage;[181][182] and enhancing carbon sinks through, for example, reforestation and preventing deforestation.[181][182]

Near- and long-term trends in the global energy system are inconsistent with limiting global warming at below 1.5 or 2 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels.[183][184] Pledges made as part of the Cancún agreements are broadly consistent with having a likely chance (66 to 100% probability) of limiting global warming (in the 21st century) at below 3 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels.[184]

In limiting warming at below 2 °C, more stringent emission reductions in the near-term would allow for less rapid reductions after 2030.[185] Many integrated models are unable to meet the 2 °C target if pessimistic assumptions are made about the availability of mitigation technologies.[186]

Adaptation Edit

Main article: Adaptation to global warming

Other policy responses include adaptation to climate change. Adaptation to climate change may be planned, either in reaction to or anticipation of climate change, or spontaneous, i.e., without government intervention.[187] Planned adaptation is already occurring on a limited basis.[181] The barriers, limits, and costs of future adaptation are not fully understood.[181]

A concept related to adaptation is adaptive capacity, which is the ability of a system (human, natural or managed) to adjust to climate change (including climate variability and extremes) to moderate potential damages, to take advantage of opportunities, or to cope with consequences.[188] Unmitigated climate change (i.e., future climate change without efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions) would, in the long term, be likely to exceed the capacity of natural, managed and human systems to adapt.[189]

Environmental organizations and public figures have emphasized changes in the climate and the risks they entail, while promoting adaptation to changes in infrastructural needs and emissions reductions.[190]

Climate engineering Edit

Main article: Climate engineering

Climate engineering (sometimes called by the more expansive term 'geoengineering'), is the deliberate modification of the climate. It has been investigated as a possible response to global warming, e.g. by NASA[191] and the Royal Society.[192] Techniques under research fall generally into the categories solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal, although various other schemes have been suggested. A study from 2014 investigated the most common climate engineering methods and concluded they are either ineffective or have potentially severe side effects and cannot be stopped without causing rapid climate change.[193]

Discourse about global warming Edit

Political discussion Edit

Main article: Politics of global warming
File:Stabilizing the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide at a constant level would require emissions to be effectively eliminated (vertical).png

Most countries are Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).[196] The ultimate objective of the Convention is to prevent dangerous human interference of the climate system.[197] As is stated in the Convention, this requires that GHG concentrations are stabilized in the atmosphere at a level where ecosystems can adapt naturally to climate change, food production is not threatened, and economic development can proceed in a sustainable fashion.[198] The Framework Convention was agreed in 1992, but since then, global emissions have risen.[199] During negotiations, the G77 (a lobbying group in the United Nations representing 133 developing nations)[200]:4 pushed for a mandate requiring developed countries to "[take] the lead" in reducing their emissions.[201] This was justified on the basis that: the developed world's emissions had contributed most to the stock of GHGs in the atmosphere; per-capita emissions (i.e., emissions per head of population) were still relatively low in developing countries; and the emissions of developing countries would grow to meet their development needs.[83]:290 This mandate was sustained in the Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention,[83]:290 which entered into legal effect in 2005.[202]

In ratifying the Kyoto Protocol, most developed countries accepted legally binding commitments to limit their emissions. These first-round commitments expired in 2012.[202] US President George W. Bush rejected the treaty on the basis that "it exempts 80% of the world, including major population centers such as China and India, from compliance, and would cause serious harm to the US economy."[200]:5

At the 15th UNFCCC Conference of the Parties, held in 2009 at Copenhagen, several UNFCCC Parties produced the Copenhagen Accord.[203] Parties associated with the Accord (140 countries, as of November 2010)[204]:9 aim to limit the future increase in global mean temperature to below 2 °C.[205] The 16th Conference of the Parties (COP16) was held at Cancún in 2010. It produced an agreement, not a binding treaty, that the Parties should take urgent action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to meet a goal of limiting global warming to 2 °C above pre-industrial temperatures. It also recognized the need to consider strengthening the goal to a global average rise of 1.5 °C.[206]

Scientific discussion Edit

Most scientists agree that humans are contributing to observed climate change.[80][207] A meta study of academic papers concerning global warming, published between 1991 and 2011 and accessible from Web of Knowledge, found that among those whose abstracts expressed a position on the cause of global warming, 97.2% supported the consensus view that it is man made.[208] In an October 2011 paper published in the International Journal of Public Opinion Research, researchers from George Mason University analyzed the results of a survey of 489 American scientists working in academia, government, and industry. Of those surveyed, 97% agreed that that global temperatures have risen over the past century and 84% agreed that "human-induced greenhouse warming" is now occurring, only 5% disagreeing that human activity is a significant cause of global warming.[209][210] National science academies have called on world leaders for policies to cut global emissions.[211]

In the scientific literature, there is a strong consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused mainly by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases. No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view.[212][213]

Discussion by the public and in popular media Edit

Main article: climate change denial

The global warming controversy refers to a variety of disputes, substantially more pronounced in the popular media than in the scientific literature,[214][215] regarding the nature, causes, and consequences of global warming. The disputed issues include the causes of increased global average air temperature, especially since the mid-20th century, whether this warming trend is unprecedented or within normal climatic variations, whether humankind has contributed significantly to it, and whether the increase is wholly or partially an artifact of poor measurements. Additional disputes concern estimates of climate sensitivity, predictions of additional warming, and what the consequences of global warming will be.

From 1990–1997 in the United States, conservative think tanks mobilized to challenge the legitimacy of global warming as a social problem. They challenged the scientific evidence, argued that global warming will have benefits, and asserted that proposed solutions would do more harm than good.[216]

Some people dispute aspects of climate change science.[207][217] Organizations such as the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute, conservative commentators, and some companies such as ExxonMobil have challenged IPCC climate change scenarios, funded scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus, and provided their own projections of the economic cost of stricter controls.[218][219][220][221] Some fossil fuel companies have scaled back their efforts in recent years,[222] or even called for policies to reduce global warming.[223]

Surveys of public opinion Edit

Main article: Public opinion on climate change

A 2010 poll by the Office for National Statistics found that 75% of UK respondents were at least "fairly convinced" that the world's climate is changing, compared to 87% in a similar survey in 2006.[224] A January 2011 ICM poll in the UK found 83% of respondents viewed climate change as a current or imminent threat, while 14% said it was no threat. Opinion was unchanged from an August 2009 poll asking the same question, though there had been a slight polarisation of opposing views.[225]

By 2010, with 111 countries surveyed, Gallup determined that there was a substantial decrease since 2007-8 in the number of Americans and Europeans who viewed global warming as a serious threat. In the US, just a little over half the population (53%) now viewed it as a serious concern for either themselves or their families; this was 10 points below the 2008 poll (63%). Latin America had the biggest rise in concern: 73% said global warming is a serious threat to their families.[226] This global poll also found that people are more likely to attribute global warming to human activities than to natural causes, except in the USA where nearly half (47%) of the population attributed global warming to natural causes.[227]

A March–May 2013 survey by Pew Research Center for the People & the Press polled 39 countries about global threats. According to 54% of those questioned, global warming featured top of the perceived global threats.[228] In a January 2013 survey, Pew found that 69% of Americans say there is solid evidence that the Earth's average temperature has been getting warmer over the past few decades, up six points since November 2011 and 12 points since 2009.[229]

Etymology Edit

According to Erik M. Conway, global warming became the dominant popular term after June 1988, when NASA climate scientist James Hansen used the term in a testimony to Congress[230] when he said: "global warming has reached a level such that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed warming."[231] Conway claims that this testimony was widely reported in the media and subsequently global warming became the commonly used term by both the press and in public discourse. However, he also points out that "global climate change" is the more scientifically accurate term, because changes in Earth systems are not limited to surface temperatures.[230]

See also Edit

Notes Edit

  1. Scientific journals use "global warming" to describe an increasing global average temperature just at earth's surface, and most of these authorities further limit "global warming" to such increases caused by human activities or increasing greenhouse gases.
  2. The 2001 joint statement was signed by the national academies of science of Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, the Caribbean, the People's Republic of China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the UK.[11] The 2005 statement added Japan, Russia, and the U.S. The 2007 statement added Mexico and South Africa. The Network of African Science Academies, and the Polish Academy of Sciences have issued separate statements. Professional scientific societies include American Astronomical Society, American Chemical Society, American Geophysical Union, American Institute of Physics, American Meteorological Society, American Physical Society, American Quaternary Association, Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, European Academy of Sciences and Arts, European Geosciences Union, European Science Foundation, Geological Society of America, Geological Society of Australia, Geological Society of London-Stratigraphy Commission, InterAcademy Council, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, International Union for Quaternary Research, National Association of Geoscience Teachers, National Research Council (US), Royal Meteorological Society, and World Meteorological Organization.
  3. Earth has already experienced almost 1/2 of the 2.0 °C (3.6 °F) described in the Cancún Agreement. In the last 100 years, Earth's average surface temperature increased by about 0.8 °C (1.4 °F) with about two thirds of the increase occurring over just the last three decades.[27]
  4. The greenhouse effect produces an average worldwide temperature increase of about 33 °C (59 °F) compared to black body predictions without the greenhouse effect, not an average surface temperature of 33 °C (91 °F). The average worldwide surface temperature is about 14 °C (57 °F).
  5. A rise in temperature from 10 °C to 20 °C is not a doubling of absolute temperature; a rise from (273 + 10) K = 283 K to (273 + 20) K = 293 K is an increase of (293 − 283)/283 = 3.5 %.

Citations Edit

  1. Script error
  2. Script errorThe U.S. Global Change Research Program, the National Academy of Sciences, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have each independently concluded that warming of the climate system in recent decades is 'unequivocal'. This conclusion is not drawn from any one source of data but is based on multiple lines of evidence, including three worldwide temperature datasets showing nearly identical warming trends as well as numerous other independent indicators of global warming (e.g., rising sea levels, shrinking Arctic sea ice).
  3. Script error
  4. IPCC, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis - Summary for Policymakers, Observed Changes in the Climate System, p. 2, in IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia."
  5. http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2015/03/19/thirty_years_of_above_average_temperatures_mean_we_re_entering_a_new_era.html
  6. 6.0 6.1 Script error
  7. Script error
  8. Script error
  9. Stocker et al., Technical Summary, in IPCC AR5 WG1 2013.
  10. Script error
  11. Script error
  12. Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007, pp. 59–63
  13. Solomon et al., Technical Summary, Section TS.5.3: Regional-Scale Projections, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007.
  14. Script error
  15. On snowfall:
    • Script error
    • Script error
    • Script error
  16. Script error
  17. US NRC 2012, p. 31
  18. Script error. Most countries in the world are Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which has adopted the 2 °C target. As of 25 November 2011, there are 195 parties (194 states and 1 regional economic integration organization (the European Union)) to the UNFCCC.
  19. Script error, excerpt from the founding international treaty that took force on 21 March 1994.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Script error
  21. Gupta, S. et al. 13.2 Climate change and other related policies, in IPCC AR4 WG3 2007.
  22. Script error, in IEA 2009, pp. 173–184 (pp.175-186 of PDF)
  23. 23.0 23.1 Script error
  24. Adger, et al., Chapter 17: Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity, Executive summary, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007.
  25. 6. Generating the funding needed for mitigation and adaptation (PDF), in Script error
  26. 26.0 26.1 Script error "(...) deep cuts in global greenhouse gas emissions are required according to science, and as documented in the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, with a view to reducing global greenhouse gas emissions so as to hold the increase in global average temperature below 2 °C above preindustrial levels"
  27. Script error
  28. Rhein, M., et al. (7 June 2013): Box 3.1, in: Chapter 3: Observations: Ocean (final draft accepted by IPCC Working Group I), pp.11-12 (pp.14-15 of PDF chapter), in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013
  29. IPCC (11 November 2013): D.3 Detection and Attribution of Climate Change, in: Summary for Policymakers (finalized version), p.15, in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013
  30. Trenberth et al., Ch. 3, Observations: Atmospheric Surface and Climate Change, Section 3.2.2.2: Urban Heat Islands and Land Use Effects, p. 244, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007.
  31. Jansen et al., Ch. 6, Palaeoclimate, Section 6.6.1.1: What Do Reconstructions Based on Palaeoclimatic Proxies Show?, pp. 466–478, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007.
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 Script error
  33. Script error
  34. Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007
  35. Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
  36. Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007, p. 99
  37. Script error
  38. Script error
  39. Script error
  40. Script error
  41. Script error
  42. Script error
  43. Script error
  44. Script error
  45. Script error
  46. Script error
  47. Script error
  48. Script error
  49. Trenberth et al., Chap 3, Observations: Atmospheric Surface and Climate Change, Executive Summary, p. 237, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007.
  50. Script error
  51. Script error
  52. Script error
  53. TS.3.1.2 Spatial Distribution of Changes in Temperature, Circulation and Related Variables - AR4 WGI Technical Summary
  54. Ehhalt et al., Chapter 4: Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases, Section 4.2.3.1: Carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2), p. 256, in IPCC TAR WG1 2001.
  55. Script error
  56. Script error
  57. Script error, p.2
  58. US NRC 2012, p. 9
  59. 59.0 59.1 Hegerl et al., Chapter 9: Understanding and Attributing Climate Change, Section 9.4.1.5: The Influence of Other Anthropogenic and Natural Forcings, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007, pp. 690–691. "Recent estimates indicate a relatively small combined effect of natural forcings on the global mean temperature evolution of the second half of the 20th century, with a small net cooling from the combined effects of solar and volcanic forcings." p. 690
  60. doi:10.1126/science.1173983
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
    Script error
    Script error
    doi:10.1073/pnas.0805721105
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  61. Script error
  62. Script error
  63. The Callendar Effect: the life and work of Guy Stewart Callendar (1898–1964) Amer Meteor Soc., Boston. ISBN 978-1-878220-76-9
  64. Script error, p. 97, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007: "To emit 240 W m–2, a surface would have to have a temperature of around −19 °C. This is much colder than the conditions that actually exist at the Earth's surface (the global mean surface temperature is about 14 °C). Instead, the necessary −19 °C is found at an altitude about 5 km above the surface."
  65. Script error
  66. Script error
  67. Script error
  68. Script error
  69. Script error
  70. Script error
  71. Script error
  72. Script error
  73. doi:10.1038/nature06949
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  74. Script error
  75. IPCC, Summary for Policymakers, Concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases ..., p. 7, in IPCC TAR WG1 2001.
  76. Script error
  77. Script error
  78. Script error
  79. Rogner, H.-H., et al., Chap. 1, Introduction, Section 1.3.1.2: Intensities, in IPCC AR4 WG3 2007.
  80. 80.0 80.1 Script error
  81. Script error
  82. Banuri et al., Chapter 3: Equity and Social Considerations, Section 3.3.3: Patterns of greenhouse gas emissions, and Box 3.1, pp. 92–93 in IPCC SAR WG3 1996.
  83. 83.0 83.1 83.2 Script error
  84. Fisher et al., Chapter 3: Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context, Section 3.1: Emissions scenarios: Issues related to mitigation in the long term context in IPCC AR4 WG3 2007.
  85. Morita, Chapter 2: Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation Scenarios and Implications, Section 2.5.1.4: Emissions and Other Results of the SRES Scenarios, in IPCC TAR WG3 2001.
  86. Rogner et al., Ch. 1: Introduction, Figure 1.7, in IPCC AR4 WG3 2007.
  87. IPCC, Summary for Policymakers, Introduction, paragraph 6, in IPCC TAR WG3 2001.
  88. Prentence et al., Chapter 3: The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Executive Summary, in IPCC TAR WG1 2001.
  89. Newell, P.J., 2000: Climate for change: non-state actors and the global politics of greenhouse. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-63250-1.
  90. Script error
  91. Script error
  92. Script error
  93. Script error
  94. Script error
  95. V. Ramanathan and G. Carmichael, supra note 1, at 221 (". . . emissions of black carbon are the second strongest contribution to current global warming, after carbon dioxide emissions.") Numerous scientists also calculate that black carbon may be second only to CO2 in its contribution to climate change, including Tami C. Bond & Haolin Sun, Can Reducing Black Carbon Emissions Counteract Global Warming, ENVIRON. SCI. TECHN. (2005), at 5921 ("BC is the second or third largest individual warming agent, following carbon dioxide and methane."); and J. Hansen, A Brighter Future, 53 CLIMATE CHANGE 435 (2002), available at http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2002/2002_Hansen_1.pdf (calculating the climate forcing of BC at 1.0±0.5 W/m2).
  96. Script error
  97. Script error
  98. IPCC, "Aerosols, their Direct and Indirect Effects", pp. 291–292 in IPCC TAR WG1 2001.
  99. PMID 15749818 (PubMed)
    Citation will be completed automatically in a few minutes. Jump the queue or expand by hand
  100. Script error
  101. Script error
  102. 102.0 102.1 IPCC, Summary for Policymakers, Human and Natural Drivers of Climate Change, Figure SPM.2, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007.
  103. Script error
  104. US NRC 2008, p. 6
  105. Hegerl, et al., Chapter 9: Understanding and Attributing Climate Change, Frequently Asked Question 9.2: Can the Warming of the 20th century be Explained by Natural Variability?, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007.
  106. Script error
  107. Hegerl et al., Chapter 9: Understanding and Attributing Climate Change, Frequently Asked Question 9.2: Can the Warming of the 20th century be Explained by Natural Variability?, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007.
  108. Script error
  109. USGCRP 2009, p. 20
  110. 110.0 110.1 Script error
  111. Script error
  112. Script error, p.19
  113. Script error
  114. Script error, pp.26-27
  115. Script error
  116. 116.0 116.1 116.2 116.3 Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007
  117. Script error, revision 2/2/2007, 8:50.08 AM.
  118. Script error
  119. IPCC, Glossary A-D: "Climate Model", in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007.
  120. Script error
  121. Script error
  122. Script error
  123. Stocker et al., Chapter 7: Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks, Section 7.2.2: Cloud Processes and Feedbacks, in IPCC TAR WG1 2001.
  124. Script error
  125. Script error
  126. Script error
  127. Randall et al., Chapter 8, Climate Models and Their Evaluation, Sec. FAQ 8.1 in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007.
  128. IPCC, Technical Summary, p. 54, in IPCC TAR WG1 2001.
  129. Script error
  130. Script error
  131. Script error
  132. Script error
  133. 133.0 133.1 4. Global Mean Sea Level Rise Scenarios, in: Main Report, in Parris & others 2012, p. 12
  134. Executive Summary, in Parris & others 2012, p. 1
  135. IPCC, Glossary A-D: "Detection and attribution", in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007. See also Hegerl et al., Section 9.1.2: What are Climate Change Detection and Attribution?, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007.
  136. Rosenzweig et al., Chapter 1: Assessment of Observed Changes and Responses in Natural and Managed Systems Section 1.2 Methods of detection and attribution of observed changes, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007 .
  137. 137.0 137.1 IPCC, Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers, Section 1: Observed changes in climate and their effects, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007.
  138. Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007
  139. Script error
  140. Global mean sea level rise in 2090–2099 relative to 1980–1999
  141. 141.0 141.1 Script error, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007
  142. PROJECTIONS OF FUTURE SEA LEVEL RISE, pp.243-244, in: Ch. 7. Sea Level Rise and the Coastal Environment, in National Research Council 2010
  143. 143.0 143.1 143.2 BOX SYN-1: SUSTAINED WARMING COULD LEAD TO SEVERE IMPACTS, p.5, in: Synopsis, in National Research Council 2011
  144. 144.0 144.1 IPCC, Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers, Section 3: Projected climate change and its impacts, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007.
  145. Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007, p. 776
  146. Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007, pp. 770, 772
  147. Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG1 2007, p. 770
  148. Script error
  149. Script error
  150. Script error, p.1. Revision 10/15/2008, 4:47:16 PM.
  151. Script error, in IPCC SREX 2012, pp. 9–13
  152. Fischlin, et al., Chapter 4: Ecosystems, their Properties, Goods and Services, Executive Summary, p. 213, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007. Executive summary not present in on-line text; see pdf.
  153. Schneider et al., Chapter 19: Assessing Key Vulnerabilities and the Risk from Climate Change, Section 19.3.4: Ecosystems and biodiversity, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007.
  154. 154.0 154.1 154.2 Ocean Acidification, in: Ch. 2. Our Changing Climate, in NCADAC 2013, pp. 69–70
  155. 155.0 155.1 Introduction, in Zeebe 2012, p. 142
  156. Ocean acidification, in: Executive summary, in Good & others 2010, p. 14
  157. 158.0 158.1 158.2 158.3 158.4 158.5
  158. BOX 2.1: STABILIZATION AND NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES (p.65), in: Chapter 2: Emissions, Concentrations, and Related Factors, in National Research Council 2011
  159. Script error, in IPCC TAR WG2 2001
  160. PMID 19251662 (PubMed)
    Citation will be completed automatically in a few minutes. Jump the queue or expand by hand
  161. 162.0 162.1 Script error, pp. 1–7. Report website
  162. Script error
  163. Script error, p.3. PDF of Report
  164. 165.0 165.1 Script error, in IPCC TAR WG2 2001
  165. Cramer, W., et al., Executive summary, in: Chapter 18: Detection and attribution of observed impacts (archived July 8 2014), pp.3-4, in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
  166. FAQ 7 and 8, in: Volume-wide Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) (archived July 8 2014), pp.2-3, in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
  167. Oppenheimer, M., et al., Section 19.6.3: Updating Reasons for Concern, in: Chapter 19: Emergent risks and key vulnerabilities (archived July 8 2014), pp.39-46, in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
  168. Field, C., et al., B-3: Regional Risks and Potential for Adaptation, in: Technical Summary (archived July 8 2014), pp.27-30, in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
  169. Oppenheimer, M., et al., Section 19.6.3: Updating Reasons for Concern, in: Chapter 19: Emergent risks and key vulnerabilities (archived July 8 2014), pp.42-43, in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
  170. Porter, J.R., et al., Executive summary, in: Chapter 7: Food security and food production systems (archived July 8 2014), p.3, in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
  171. Reference temperature period converted from late-20th century to pre-industrial times (approximated in the source as 1850-1900).
  172. Smith, K.R., et al., FAQ 11.2, in: Chapter 11: Human health: impacts, adaptation, and co-benefits (archived July 8 2014), p.37, in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
  173. Smith, K.R., et al., Section 11.4: Direct Impacts of Climate and Weather on Health, in: Chapter 11: Human health: impacts, adaptation, and co-benefits (archived July 8 2014), pp.10-13, in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
  174. Smith, K.R., et al., Section 11.6.1. Nutrition, in: Chapter 11: Human health: impacts, adaptation, and co-benefits (archived July 8 2014), pp.10-13, in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
  175. Script error
  176. Script error
  177. Script error
  178. Script error, p.177, Report no: 500062001. Report website.
  179. Mitigation, in USGCRP 2015
  180. 181.0 181.1 181.2 181.3 IPCC, Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers, Section 4: Adaptation and mitigation options, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007.
  181. 182.0 182.1 Edenhofer, O., et al., Table TS.3, in: Technical summary (archived 30 December 2014), in: IPCC AR5 WG3 2014, p. 68
  182. Clarke, L., et al., Executive summary, in: Chapter 6: Assessing Transformation Pathways (archived 30 December 2014), in: IPCC AR5 WG3 2014, p. 418
  183. 184.0 184.1 SPM4.1: Long-term mitigation pathways, in: Summary for Policymakers (archived 27 December 2014), in: IPCC AR5 WG3 2014, pp. 10-13
  184. Edenhofer, O., et al., TS.3.1.2: Short- and long-term requirements of mitigation pathways, in: Technical summary (archived 30 December 2014), in: IPCC AR5 WG3 2014, pp. 55-56
  185. Edenhofer, O., et al., TS.3.1.3: Costs, investments and burden sharing, in: Technical summary (archived 30 December 2014), in: IPCC AR5 WG3 2014, p. 58
  186. Smit et al., Chapter 18: Adaptation to Climate Change in the Context of Sustainable Development and Equity, Section 18.2.3: Adaptation Types and Forms, in IPCC TAR WG2 2001.
  187. Script error, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
  188. Script error, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007
  189. Script error
  190. Script error
  191. Script error
  192. Script error
  193. Quoted in IPCC SAR SYR 1996, "Synthesis of Scientific-Technical Information Relevant to Interpreting Article 2 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change", paragraph 4.1, p. 8 (pdf p. 18.)
  194. Script error
  195. Script error
  196. Script error
  197. Rogner et al., Chapter 1: Introduction, Executive summary, in IPCC AR4 WG3 2007.
  198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700609104
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  199. 200.0 200.1 Script error
  200. Script error
  201. 202.0 202.1 Script error
  202. Script error
  203. Script error This publication is also available in e-book format
  204. Script error
  205. Script error
  206. 207.0 207.1 Script error This document is also available in PDF format
  207. Script error
  208. Script error
  209. Script error
  210. Script error
  211. Script error
  212. Script error
  213. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  214. Script error
  215. Aaron M. McCright and Riley E. Dunlap, "Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement's Counter-Claims", Social Problems, November 2000, Vol. 47 Issue 4, pp 499–522 in JSTOR
  216. Script error
    • Script error
  217. Script error
  218. Script error
  219. Script error
  220. Script error
  221. Script error
  222. Script error
  223. Script error
  224. Script error
  225. Script error
  226. Script error
  227. Script error
  228. Climate Change: Key Data Points from Pew Research | Pew Research Center
  229. 230.0 230.1 Erik Conway. "What's in a Name? Global Warming vs. Climate Change", NASA, 5 December 2008
  230. U.S. Senate, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, "Greenhouse Effect and Global Climate Change, part 2" 100th Cong., 1st sess., 23 June 1988, p. 44.

References Edit

  • Script error, Secretariat: TWAS (the Academy of Sciences for the Developing World), Trieste, Italy.
  • Script error
  • Script error pdf. The "Full Report", consisting of "The IPCC Second Assessment Synthesis of Scientific-Technical Information Relevant to Interpreting Article 2 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change" and the Summaries for Policymakers of the three Working Groups.
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • 12px This article incorporates public domain material from the US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) document: Script error. Public-domain status of this report can be found on p.4 of PDF
  • Script error
  • Script error Also available as PDF
  • Script error.
</dl>

Further reading Edit

  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error (pb: 0-521-01507-3)
  • Script error. Paper at IDEAS.
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error (see Chapter 8)
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error OCLC 317650570, 50016270 and 163149563
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error
  • Script error(online version requires registration)
  • Script error
  • Script error
</dl>

External links Edit

Redirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.style="padding-top:0.75em;"Redirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Search WiktionaryRedirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.style="padding-top:0.75em;"Redirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Definitions from Wiktionary Redirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Search WikinewsRedirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.News stories from Wikinews Redirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Search WikiquoteRedirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Quotations from Wikiquote Redirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Search WikisourceRedirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Source texts from Wikisource Redirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Search CommonsRedirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Media from Commons Redirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Search WikibooksRedirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Textbooks from Wikibooks Redirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Search WikiversityRedirect arrow without textmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.Learning resources from Wikiversity

Script error

Research
Educational

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.