Forum:A role for ordinary citizens in UK sustainable development
From Sustainable Community Action
|
This is a draft for posting to the current Defra wiki
The idea of an environmental contract may open up possibilities. Expressed as an understanding between government and citizens, it explicitly involves the latter. Whether or not it genuinely opens up possibilities depends on what type of role the government can envisage for citizens.
Since the contraction of Local Agenda 21, the field of sustainable development in England seems to have been dominated by professional and expert, remote and establishment elites.
To ordinary citizens and community groups interested in sustainability, recent government and establishment initiatives can seem like forever rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic. No matter how cleverly experts talk amongst themselves, there won't be enough progress till there's genuine involvement and inclusion of ordinary citizens.
This is most apparent at local level, but the good thing is that it's here that there's probably the greatest potential to turn things around.
There's been a lot of rhetoric recently about devolution and localism, but much practice can seem to remain top down - however much people may object to that term. (Perhaps people object to it because it hits the nail on the head?)
For ordinary people and community groups to get genuine involvement and so achieve genuine influence, there must be fewer and fewer no-go areas - specifically the joined-up and the strategic. Because genuine sustainability must be about both of these, shallow, superficial, single-issue, piecemeal, tokenistic, short term or otherwise unsustained community involvement initiatives just won't be enough.
"Our central recommendation is that communications should be redefined across government to
mean a continuous dialogue with all interested parties, encompassing a broader range of skills
and techniques than those associated with media relations. The focus of attention should be
the general public" - Recommendation no. 1 of the Phillis report, January 2004.
[edit] Related topics
- Forum:Community involvement vital for adequate response to climate change
- Forum:How to go beyond politics-as-usual
- Forum:Will Gordon Brown be remembered for fiddling with community involvement while the planet burns?
- Forum:Local forum idea for sustainable communities
- Forum:Climate change and the environment, UK citizens too
- Forum:A role for ordinary citizens in UK sustainable development
- Participatory carbon budgeting
- Local involvement leads to happier communities
- Sustainability for all
- Open involvement
- Community involvement UK
- How can Community Strategies be turned into Sustainable Community Strategies?
- Do our top sustainability organisations get active citizenship?
Forum - Index - Tea rooms - Community involvement - Help desk
SCA Wiki - Places, projects & networks - Ideas Bank - News - Diary - Resources - Community Portal / Avoid ads
References
- The Phillis report can be accesssed via Cabinet Office news
- The original version of this article was first published on the Sustainable Community Action wiki.
- ↑ Mash the State, 13 October 2009
- ↑ Communities and Local Government, September 23, 2009
- ↑ Sustainable Development Commission, July 1, 2009
- ↑ Living with rats, June 29, 2009
- ↑ Communities and Local Government, June 23, 2009
- ↑ The Strategist, May 30, 2009
- ↑ Living with rats, June 3, 2009
- ↑ Living with rats, June 2, 2009
- ↑ University of Copenhagen, March 12 2009
- ↑ BBC News, October 28
- ↑ Friends of the Earth August 24
